ed s s ix Ye Ye omsF elec s T obile42%No Ye13 M ts s irpor60%Ye No A 80%No s irlines Ye t A > ts s or Ye No ansporP r T s y a s 1 90%Ye No ailw > R oad No s R Ye 56,000 > ors s t ec Ye istribution D s s Ye Ye asansmission G r ts in Enabling ST ain t 90%s s Ye Ye mpor > onstrI tion s s a Ye Ye ener 50–90% G ompetition C 25 trum allocation. No istribution D ding spec tions and C egar or isty s No1 100%Ye tricitansmission , notably r r tion DT Elect es s tur egula 90%Ye N/A mpor > ts I et R et struc ark tion s s ying 昀椀eld or lacks independence a Ye Ye e conduc ener 60% e pla egulat G y - entionsy n y gest v eig e y enc e esenceer e anticompetitivential orangements and marktivor tur m ms t entr t the competitiver has ery y frameecs elaboration Examples of Me of laror pric ory ef or ’ ticipation in t or or elecommunication R 2 gest 昀椀r-secestre ban on entro prorstural or* egulatuthorT et strucet sharer (%)e pareernment intiminat egulategulatk or ine昀昀y ky v hat r hat facilitathat distgest pla it ce: A ar ivato T elativTollusionT eatment of f or e: * the ABLE MarkMplaStatthe larregal or natural egulategulations P Number of 昀椀rGa) Lmonopolies*Rb) CAbusec) Laraccess tconditionsDiscrtroperatInstitutional arrNo strucunbundling of SOENo rNo independent rNo rwrLack of rclarLack of transparour T S Not